[1], The films co-director, Mark Vicente, would go on to co-found The Knife Media, a pro-Trump digital news outlet linked to NXIVM. But they add that the film shows quantum mysteries selectively to shore up metaphysical points. Nasa found something. One possible answer: they go to an alternative universe where people are asking the same question: 'where'd they go?'" Certainly, our attitudes and brain chemistry affect how we see the world and get through life. [19], According to Margaret Wertheim, "History abounds with religious enthusiasts who have read spiritual portent into the arrangement of the planets, the vacuum of space, electromagnetic waves and the big bang. About. These photos may well be art they're sure as hell not science. And a lot of people talk about quantum consciousness that even if the everyday world we see is not a system that can be changed, our consciousness about the world can be changed. Otherwise, the process falls "outside the realm of physical statements and has entered the realm of spiritual belief.". Therefore people get the notion that there's no objective reality, and that you can literally impact on the external world just by doing things internally. Quantum mechanics is a replacement for the phrase "anything goes." You dont have a Christian Science Monitor This is an explanation to help understand what might be going on, but it is not part of the theory because it is not falsifiable: it cannot be tested in such a way that, if it were false, it would fail the test (without falsifying the whole of quantum mechanics, and therefore all the other interpretations too). Human everyday life consists of many routines and necessary things that are mostly physical such as work, school, a number of chores or minor responsibilities, and hopefully sleep. She does play a large role in the movie and you can read all about her nonsense here. The web makes all such things available today, so I can give you a Google link to a page about Maharishis unified field theory, http://www.worldpeaceendowment.org/invincibility/invincibility6.html. Intercut with these metaphysical ponderings is a soapy fictional narrative starring Marlee Matlin as a broken-hearted photographer. I think of what Niels Bohr said to Wolfgang Pauli about theories that are "not crazy enough to be true." But this only applies to sub-atomic particles a rock doesn't need you to bump into it to exist. My FIL is a ex-Air force Pilot. "I think the point is that Feynman realized that people can be fooled, but nature can't.". I remember Hagelin wanting to discuss how quantum field theory could explain how TMers were able to levitate, something about how they did this by changing the position of the pole in the propagator. The quantum world is intriguing, but unless you're a particle physicist it's got very little to do with the world's reality. On the whole they were a bunch of complete flakes, although one of them (David Albert) is a philosopher of science here at Columbia. To date, Dr Emoto has not taken up the challenge. [5] Foreign gross added another $5 million for a worldwide gross of nearly $16 million. Q: But isn't everything really connected? Down The Rabbit Hole\". If I didnt know any better, I would have thought it was something straight out of a Cheech and Chong movie. It was the biggest bunch of garbage that I had ever seen. Featuring interviews with scientists and theologians, this compelling film thrusts the viewer into a world where science and spirituality intersect. what the bleep do we know watch online free, what the bleep do we know trailer, what the bleep do we know movie, what the bleep do we know debunked, what the bleep do . John Haglin . - - What the Bleep Do We Know postulates the existence of a spiritual connection between the realms of quantum physics and consciousness, demonstrating this through inspiring visual effects, story-telling and interviews with experts. And if you're a modern thinker you'll know for a fact that quantum physics is wacky stuff. Hagelin was a grad student at Harvard when I was an undergrad and I met him when we were in the same quantum field theory class. Free delivery for many products. Our mind has enormous potential, but we only use a small part of it for conscious thought, and we miss a lot of what's going on around us so, in a leap of creatively edited logic 3. Details in the video itself.EXTENDED REFERENCES:Revelation:[a] Michael Freze, 1993, Voices, Visions, and Apparitions, OSV Publishing ISBN 087973454X page 252[b] http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/faith[c] http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=confidence[d] http://www.thefreedictionary.com/faith[e] http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/faith[f] Dictionary.com. His list of "worst abusers" includes inspirational author Deepak Chopra, the best-selling book "The Secret" and the whole field of Transcendental Meditation. Gripping stuff, but nothing to do with our daily lives. He announced in 1994 (one year after the study) that violent crime had decreased 18%. The article states that the domestic gross exceeded $10 million, described as not bad for a low-budget documentary, and that the DVD release attained even more significant success with over a million units shipped in the first six months following its release in March 2005. To accomplish that, you would have to invoke "new physics," Dr. Schumm says, in which the explanation can be verified or falsified through experiment. Bleep was conceived and its production funded by William Arntz, who co-directed the film along with Betsy Chasse and Mark Vicente; all three were students of Ramtha's School of Enlightenment. !" is a radical departure from convention. You may or may not believe that there's an external reality beyond what your brain creates; the topic will be a perennial and fertile source of discussion. People tend to believe that the fact that a certain kind of research is pursued by sizable numbers of people with very good credentials is enough to mean it must be good research. Mark was born in Johannesburg, South Africa . Use these social-bookmarking links to share What the bleep are they on about?. You can't change the world by thinking about it. And it certainly doesn't depend on an observer to make this happen. What could be worse than being aware of every tiny detail that your brain handles from phosphate levels to heart rate and hair growth. You can renew your subscription or But Hagelin's use of the term "achieved" for the drop in crime is a bit strong. !" is a radical departure from convention. Everything from the possibility of disappearing and reappearing, to the possibility of having strange new forms of communication. A disproportionate amount of time was given in voice and film to Ramtha, Dr. Joe dispenza, and Miceal Ledwith. It was really hard to sit through. (stylized as What t #$*! "They take advantage of things we don't know very well or can't test very well, then use it in an unfair way," notes Andr de Gouva, a particle physicist at Northwestern University in Evanston, Ill. For many years in the early-mid-eighties, the Maharishi was pushing N=8 supergravity as the unified field theory, I remember a colorful poster explaining how it agreed exactly with his philosophy that many people posted on their walls. [1], In mid-2005, the filmmakers worked with HCI Books to expand on the film's themes in a book titled What the Bleep Do We Know! Whether you're religious, spiritual, or none of the above, you can say one thing for this movie: it's an equal-opportunity offender. Invariably only about half the people tested ever notice a woman in a gorilla suit walking across the middle of the screen during the game. The observer effect of quantum physics isn't about people or reality. It comes from the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, and it's about the limitations of trying to measure the position and momentum of subatomic particles. Given a few contextual clues, like whether the eyelids are open or shut, it can work out whether it's seeing something or remembering it. Heisenberg basically says you can't get a really accurate fix on both the position and the momentum of a subatomic particle say an electron at the same time. The researchers' bottom line: Quantum physics is about matter at its most fundamental levels and matter's interactions; it's not about spirituality. That movie started its life as a small documentary about Spirit and Science, but grew in scope (and budget) and became What the BLEEP Do We Know!? Who believe, in all kinds of things(God maybe?). The experts start "proving" that humans create their own reality by getting too attached to certain brain chemicals. They are relevant because of the deliberateness on the part of the film makers to keep certain facts unknown (ironically, it is I making the unknown know) and misrepresent others. Many religions and spiritual paths--from Hinduism, with its concept of maya, to Christian Science--teach that appearance is illusion. I think its a good idea for people to consider the example of Hagelin: hes completely delusional and has zero common sense, but able to function at a high level in the particle theory community. "[20], Journalist John Gorenfeld, writing in Salon, notes that the film's three directors are students of Ramtha's School of Enlightenment, which he says has been described as a cult. Our mind has enormous potential, but we only use a small part of it for conscious thought, and we miss a lot of what's going on around us. Then we segue to a narrative starring Amanda (Marlee Maitlin), a wedding photographer who's bummed because her slimy husband cheated on her. Pingback: yeago works Blog Archive Jesus, Buddha, Ken Wilber?? [12][13] Lisa Randall refers to the film as "the bane of scientists". While the (probabilistic) predictions of quantum mechanics are, as far . Quantum physics tells us that reality isn't fixed subatomic particles only come into existence when they are observed, 2. was heavily criticised for being "a documentary aimed at the totally gullible". The movie gives two examples of experiments which have shown the power of the mind affecting reality. (Refugees in Sudan or people in Baghdad would have an even tougher time accepting the film's premise.). 3. Those points suggest that quantum-derived "possibilities" affect the wider world, that human thought is the ultimate arbiter of physical reality, and that by manipulating thought properly, people can achieve harmony and even shape the structure of matter. But that still doesn't mean that, at a global level, the weirdness of quantum mechanics is manifest. Never mind that the movie didnt even have a plot. Update: More information at the end of the video description.Comment approval now removed. The meditation may not have helped the victims of violent crime, but it did win Hagelin the 1994 Ig Nobel Peace Prize. DO WE KNOW? It demands a freedom of view and greatness of thought so far unknown, indeed, not even dreamed of since Copernicus. It's used as an excuse to be even weirder. The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle argues that its impossible to track the momentum and position of a subatomic particle. Neither of them convincingly achieve this. The pity of it is that there are fascinating conversations going on in the science-and-religion sphere. With quantum mechanics, there's a notion that observers affect the things that they're observing. The film's central point--that reality is a construct of our own brains--seems rife with intriguing cinematic possibilities. You'll even applaud the wedding Polka scene there's just not enough Eastern European folk culture in contemporary film. "[10], What the Bleep Do We Know!? But to insist, as one on-screen interviewee does, that the material world around us is just one "possible movement of consciousness" undermines the possibility of any objective, external reality--something fundamental to many religions and to science. It's actually the machine that's the observer, not the human who's jotting down results. There was some sort of plot involving a woman photographer (played by Marlee Matlin), who wanders around and has anxiety attacks. Hidden Messages In Water Hidden Messages in . ?, never before seen DVD programming features, 20 minutes of new animation, new interviews, along with 5 hours of uncut interviews and a filmmakers Q&A, the Quantum Edition contains over 15 hours of material on 6 DVD sides. If we don't understand classical consciousness, how can we understand quantum consciousness? (commonly referred to by its spoken title What the Bleep Do We Know) is a 2004 pseudoscientific film that supports the idea that consciousness and quantum mechanics are somehow related. (Physicists should take part of the blame for this confusion. Publishers Weekly What the Bleep Do We Know!? According to his books, water exposed to loving words shows brilliant and attractive patterns, while water exposed to negative thoughts forms incomplete patterns. : Down the Rabbit Hole: Directed by William Arntz, Betsy Chasse, Mark Vicente. First, such claims rely on "hidden variables" susceptible to influence, he says. Often, people who are trying to sell whatever it is they're trying to sell try to justify it on the basis of science. 3. "But that's two leaps beyond what scientists believe to be true.". "Particles appear and disappear where do they go when they're not here? We're not using either superconductivity or superfluidity yet on the scale that I think people thought we might. For traditional Christians, God is God not because your brain is making him up, but because he is. Update: More information at the end of the video description.Comment approval now removed. Krauss has dealt with factual and fictional weirdness for decades as the author of "The Physics of Star Trek," as the head of Arizona State University's Origins Project, and as the author of a "Quantum Man," a soon-to-be-published biography of pioneering physicist Richard Feynman. We must shake off the "ugly, superstitious, backwater concept of God" we learned as children, chides JZ Knight--uh, Ramtha. Your subscription to Do we know" . Wertheim continues that the film "abandons itself entirely to the ecstasies of quantum mysticism, finding in this aleatory description of nature the key to spiritual transformation. To the blessed memory of all ISHEAGU Indigenes (Anioma) slain by the Nigerian Army on 2ND MAY 1968. Krauss discussed his criteria ln our interview last week. And I came out of wanting to meditate more often, which can't be a bad thing. Mon August 23, 2021: The US Food and Drug Administration on Monday granted full approval to the Pfizer/BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine for people age 16 and older. Even skeptics concede that we humans can fall into destructive thought patterns and need to cleanse our vision of what's real. For starters you'd have to take a lot of samples from different parts of each ice specimen. The fact that someone who spouts such utter nonsense can get a Ph.D. from Harvard and be one of the most widely cited authors on supersymmetric models is pretty remarkable. They want suggestions, not formulas. IE 11 is not supported. Not exactly, Amit. They're coming into the marketplace hungry for direction, but they don't want some person who claims to have all the answers. Knight's compound outside the town of Yelm has been built over the former horse-breeding grounds: The estate consists of JZ's present home, a white 12,800 square foot French chateau styled 4-bedroom house, her original home (a 1,600 sq. Amit Gotswami - Dr. 3) Lots of people still hunger for a magical universe, and now hope that science can deliver it, after Nietsche's announcement of God's death. They may applaud the central tenets of the movie, but not its disjointed narrative, clunky acting, bizarre thematic segues, and faux "facts." He also has been marketing several products within the school and its followers. ft. indoor riding arena once used for horse training which was refurbished and floored . After a successful DVD launch in March of 2005, Fox . One should take seriously the danger that hes not the only one deluding himself. The reason you should be suspicious is because we don't even understand classical consciousness. 2) "What the Bleep Do We Know" has sure got a lot of people talking and thinking. Bleep raises thought-provoking questions about science and its relationship to spirituality and metaphysics. Even though there's lots of proof that the Moon landing happened, some people don't . You can be accurate in one or the other, but not in both. [9] In his review, Dave Kehr of The New York Times described the "transition from quantum mechanics to cognitive therapy" as "plausible", but stated also that "the subsequent leapfrom cognitive therapy into large, hazy spiritual beliefsisn't as effectively executed. John Hagelin, PhD, describes a study he did in Washington in 1992. A: Quantum mechanics is often quoted as the explanation for many things, because it's so weird that people latch onto it as a hope, to explain everything that they would like to believe about the universe. William Arntz has referred to the film as "WTFDWK" in a message to the film's street team. Dr Joe Dispenza (the one who creates his day) has gone to court and testified that his teacher (ramtha) has told him that terrible times are coming and that he needs to protect his family. The brain processes 400 billion bits of information a second but we're only aware of 2000 of these but our awareness of those 2000 bits of information are just about the environment, our body and about time. In a corrupt, greed-fueled world, a powerful alchemist leads a Christ-like character and seven materialistic figures to the Holy Mountain,. It's more like a collision in the editing room between talking heads, an impenetrable human parable and a hallucinogenic animated cartoon. Q: Why do you think that people have seized upon this? I guess it's a sign that quantum physics is entering the mainstream A: Well, yeah, the point is that there have been these new-age desires for lots of things to make the world better: crystals, energy vortices. What the Bleep Do We Know? You can't just hope for the best. He also invested over $10,000.00 in an infamous scam that infected RSE and was touted by Ramtha as a vehicle to gain fabulous wealth and many of the schools membership lost substantial sums of money. This message will appear once per week That's what makes the world so interesting. Reality is happening in our brain all the time we're receiving it but it's not being integrated." "Physical reality is absolutely rock solid, yet it only comes into existence when it bumps up against another piece of physical reality like us, or a rock." Dr. Jeffrey Satinover (psychiatrist, PhD candidate in physics), in What the Bleep Do We Know? The Bleep in a Nutshell: 1. And while I'm no quantum physicist, my yoga teacher a big fan of the movie was starting to sound like she was. I am glad that someone else thought that that movie was a bunch of garbage. My main objection is to the "blessed water" segment which was utter bull****, but the rest of the movie is ok and is designed to start people . [16], David Albert, a philosopher of physics who appears in the film, has accused the filmmakers of selectively editing his interview to make it appear that he endorses the film's thesis that quantum mechanics is linked with consciousness. Her experiences are offered by the filmmakers to illustrate the film's scientifically-unsupported thesis about quantum physics and consciousness. So when you hear about quantum mechanics and devices, you can say, "OK, that sounds reasonable." "I create my own reality, says quantum physics," intones one expert, and the viewer could be lured to accept this as proof. So what constitutes quantum quackery? But I assume that's not quite right, and that sometimes quantum mechanics' name is taken in vain. Answer (1 of 6): Although not being as well educated in the area as Professor Wacker, I think it's overly simplistic to suggest the subjects raised in the movie to be either factual or "almost completely mumbo-jumbo". But above a tiny size range, quantum properties collapse, and particles start to behave in the way described by classical physics - more like bowling balls than fuzzy clouds of "wave functions. The director, William Arntz, has described What the Bleep as a film for the "metaphysical left". It demands a freedom of view and greatness of thought so far unknown, indeed, not even dreamed of since Copernicus. Study Guide", "Teaching physics mysteries versus pseudoscience", "Review: What The Bleep Do We Know!? up and at each step we're eliminating information and finally what is bubbling up to consciousness is the one that is most self-serving. Once they do bump into each other they form their regular little selves. has been described as "a kind of New Age answer to The Passion of the Christ and other films that adhere to traditional religious teachings. What the bleep do we know debunked Isn't life great? ISHEAGU MASSACRE HISTORICAL BACKGROUND: Isheagu is a town whose origin is traceable to the Eastern part of the contraption called Nigeria. People latch onto their dreams, and they always try to match them to reality. The plot follows the fictional story of a photographer, using documentary-style interviews and computer-animated graphics, as she encounters emotional and existential obstacles in her life and begins to consider the idea that individual and group consciousness can influence the material world. With researchers and theoretical scientists leading the way, it takes the reader through the looking glass of quantum physics into a universe that is more bizarre and alive than ever imagined. https://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2005/06/30/2839498.htm? Isnt Langs viewpoint in line with the sort of criticism that string theory receives at this web site? From my perspective, once you had identtified Smolins position( I gave this in previous post[Posted by sol at September 25, 2004 04:18 PM] ), then you would know he holds Einsteins, in relation to the Solvay meetings, and strings have modified what Bohr and Schrodinger were doing in developing QM. ), is hooked on prescription pills, and mopes about while her chirpy roommate spatters paint around their apartment. On certain scales, for certain times, in certain regions, everything goes and strange things happen. 2004 ( ) ( ) Offline 2013. ", "The movie is saying that somehow we can all get together and, with our collective thought processes, we can influence the outcome" of physical events - be they life experiences or scientific experiments, notes Bruce Schumm, a particle physicist at the University of California at Santa Cruz. Featuring two (!) Everyone knows quantum mechanics is weird, so why not use that to justify it? But I start to choke on my $8 popcorn when science is manipulated to make a cult leader's claims sound more plausible. There are also phrases plagiarized entire from "The Matrix," a far superior film treatment of the notion that reality isn't what it seems. He says he is "profoundly unsympathetic to attempts at linking quantum mechanics with consciousness".[1]. [5] Author Barrie Dolnick adds that "people don't want to learn how to do one thing. Q: You do see that in some science-fiction shows for example, last season on "Fringe." logged you out. You might think that meant there were 18% fewer violent crimes than in the previous year, but the decrease was actually relative to his predicted increase based on some fancy statistical footwork. He is also the theologian in residence of RSE. Featuring interviews with scientists and theologians, this compelling film thrusts the viewer into a world where science and spirituality intersect. Thus, if a scientist repeats an experiment with subatomic particles often enough, the results will closely match the probabilities quantum theory predicts. If you want to affect something in the external world, you have to do something to it. Filename F:\torrent\What the Bleep Do We Know_2CD\disc one\09 What the Bleep.wav Peak level 100.0 % Extraction speed 8.6 X Track quality 100.0 % Test CRC 2A67087E Copy CRC 2A67087E Accurately ripped (confidence 4) [55AC2A89] (AR v1) Copy OK Track 10 Filename F:\torrent\What the Bleep Do We Know_2CD\disc one\10 Circle the Sun.wav Peak level 100.0 % That's its claim anyway. And while I dont think supersymmetric GUTs are anywhere near as promising as many people seem to think, they are a much saner idea than many that dominate research these days (take the Landscape, please). Suddenly people who were talking about subatomic particles are alluding to alternate universes and cosmic forces, all of which can be harnessed in the interest of making Ms. Matlin's character feel better about her thighs. Featured individuals [ edit] The film features interview segments of: The Christian Science Monitor has expired. 8. When a movie gets rave reviews as a mind-blowing flick about quantum physics, it's worth checking out. That's why we experience a classical world. Cast. The movie "What the Bleep do we know" How much is true, or just entertainment. Some ideas discussed in the film are: In the narrative segments of the film, Marlee Matlin portrays Amanda, a photographer who plays the role of everywoman as she experiences her life from startlingly new and different perspectives. The narrative follows a fictional photographer, Amanda, through her emotional and existential journey of life. To some extent it could be, because memories and thoughts are stored at the molecular level, and at a molecular level quantum mechanics is significant. Joe Dispenza As the layers to her everyday experiences fall away insertions in the story with scientists, and philosophers and religious leaders . When you hear the term "quantum consciousness," you should be suspicious. Quantum mechanics, the theoretical framework of contemporary physics, is a probability algorithm. On the other hand, one finds 3+1, or more concretely inverse square law, to be mathematically peculiar when it refers to gravity, ie when mass is the source of the force. But is reality really in the eye of the quantum observer? The host of the show said this was done because it was negative As the discussion moves from science to pop psychology, the film s endorsement of Ramtha s School Of Enlightenment and its simplistic self-improvement mantra becomes clear. Last night I went to see a movie which was advertised as being about quantum physics, called What the Bleep Do We Know?. In the late eighties I remember seeing Maharishi University preprints, perhaps about flipped SU(5). I started out thinking that BLEEP 2 would be a ground-breaking update covering ideas and discoveries in quantum physics, brain neurology and consciousness studies introduced over a decade ago. VISiT http://docsubtitles.blogspot.comsubscribe to watch full moviecheck also short trailer http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lJOrsql3KwU [17] Eric Scerri in a review for Committee for Skeptical Inquiry dismisses it as "a hodgepodge of all kinds of crackpot nonsense," where "science [is] distorted and sensationalized". She works as a free-lancer for an agency, where her boss is played by Barry Newman. Consciousness must be involved. A classic experiment on visual processing involves asking people to watch a video of 6 people passing a basketball, and press a button every time a particular team has possession.
Raffles Family Office Salary,
Do Hotels Require Proof Of Vaccination In Nyc,
What Cheese Goes With Gavi,
Articles W